issues and methodologies’s problems in assessment of the research methodologies to history of political thought

the purpose of this study was to investigate the problems of methodologicalresearch program in the history of political thought appearing valuationmethodologies. the claim is that the principles and methodology of the researchprogram evaluate the formation, expansion, and development of methodologies inthe area of knowledge. in contrast, this article argues that the research program isnot sufficient because the emphasis on the construction logic can provideunderstanding and assessment of the methodology. hence, it is in the realm oftheory and interpretation to meet numerous methodological problems: problemswithin the scope of that program to the issue of the formation of the methodology, aswell as during the formation of speech acts do not prescribe significantly. in therealm of theory, political theory after normative ignored and only focused on thecauses. in the area of interpretation, it is not able to scale phenomenon as old asinnovation and the presence of artifacts and interpretation to distinguish. because ofthat, any innovation requires that the phenomena in terms of time in the past is nottestable, exploring the phenomenon can not be considered a new interpretation.therefore, the research program is lack of attention to the internal logic of thoughtand methodology and involves three problems in methodology, theory andapplication of that methodology, the interpretation, and to address these issues,which have undergone a fundamental change, not mayhem and adjustments to betemporary.